Open University Urban Mines Worm Research Centre
Biffaward Project Number: B/1859 ENTRUST Project Number: 204032.030
January 2004
S:\biffa reports worms\Final Report.doc
Name of Organisation Partners: Open University, Urban Mines, Worm Research Centre
Project Name: Organic Food Waste Treatment Development Project
Biffaward Project Number: B/1859 ENTRUST Project Number: 204032.030
Summary of Project
The main aim of the research programme was to devise and undertake appropriate trials in order to contribute to knowledge and understanding of composting systems which utilise earthworms as the main processing agent (vermicomposting). The programme aimed to build on previous research carried out at the Worm Research Centre (WRC) into vermicomposting.
The research programme summarised in this report was based on large-scale vermicomposting trials, which were undertaken at WRC and devised and supervised by the Open University. This programme took place over the period of almost 18 months, up until November 2003. During the first few months, equipment was put in place and the worm beds were stocked up so that the first technical work started in November 2002. A report detailing the technical trials carried out for this project can be found in Appendix One.
Objectives and Achievements
The effect of bed temperature on vermicomposting rates and greenhouse gas emissions, using potato waste as a feedstock material
Five experimental earthworm composting beds were built for this trial. Individual beds measured 1.5m x 6.6m, with a depth of 0.75m. Each bed was filled with composted horse manure/wood shavings bedding material, to a depth of 0.25m when settled. The waste used as feed material was locally produced potato waste, which is a highly putrescible and wet by-product of the food processing industry.
The block of beds were protected from rain by impermeable but well ventilated covers. Liquid by products of the process were collected in a leachate drainage and collection system. The earthworm species employed during the trial was Dendrobaena veneta and populations sampled in November 2002 were found to 1.2 to 1.4 kgm-2 of bed. The first waste application for this trial and the commencement of bed monitoring programme began in December 2002.
The aim was to produce a range of bed temperatures from 5 °C to 25 °C. To achieve the low temperatures within the range, the trial was commenced during the winter months so that ambient air temperatures would naturally lower bed temperatures. The heated cables within beds were individually thermostatically controlled and this enabled the higher temperatures to be achieved during the winter months. During the first three months it was possible to maintain the bed temperatures broadly within the required range. For the following three months, the bed temperatures tended to reflect ambient temperatures, as might be expected. Mean bed temperatures achieved during the six-month study are presented in Appendix Two.
From Tables 1 and 2 in Appendix Two, for the first three-month period it can be seen that the lowest temperature bed (Bed B at 7 °C) processed the least material while the highest temperature bed (Bed C at 24 °C) processed approximately 60% more. More importantly, maintaining a moderate and achievable bed temperature of around 13-16 °C during cold ambient conditions resulted in a 50% increase in waste processing rate. Earthworm populations were broadly comparable in all beds during the first three-month period.
For the second three month period (months 4-6), the bed temperatures tended to reflect the higher ambient temperatures of spring and early summer, except for Bed C, whose thermostat was set at the highest temperature (25 °C). Hence in general the bed temperatures were higher and more uniform during this period and this resulted in greater and more uniform waste processing rates throughout.
For the beds operating under higher ambient temperatures during spring, around 560 kg of
S:\biffa reports worms\Final Report.doc - 1 -
S:\biffa reports worms\Final Report.doc
sludge was processed in 3 months per bed. This is equivalent to 0.62 kg of waste processed per square metre of bed per day and is similar to previous findings with this type of waste.
The trial showed that unheated vermicomposting beds are likely to suffer from reduced processing rates during periods of cold weather. The best processing rates were obtained from the bed heated to the optimum temperature for worm composting (20-25 °C). However, heating beds to these relatively high temperatures is not likely to be cost-effective. Heating beds to moderate temperatures (approximately 15 °C) during periods of low ambient temperatures is achievable in practice. The trial confirmed that processing rates at moderate temperatures are acceptable.
The static chamber method was used to monitor greenhouse gas emissions from the vermicomposting beds. This method is commonly used to measure gas fluxes from surface emissions and has been validated in comparison to micrometeorological methods.
The trial clearly confirmed that nitrous oxide emissions could be a potential problem for large-scale vermicomposting systems especially when operating at higher temperatures (see Appendix Two, Figures 1 and 2). It recommended that further research is urgently undertaken to determine the full extent of potential problems and to identify mitigation measures in order to minimise harmful emissions.
Comparison between vermicomposting and windrow composting of plastic wrapped vegetable waste
The feedstock waste used for the trial was predominantly whole cucumbers in plastic wrappers. It is not normally possible or cost-effective for the suppliers of the waste to remove the individual wrappers, so the waste is usually landfilled.
Although the mixed, whole cucumber waste had a relatively soft texture and would have broken down readily during biological processing, the plastic wrappings surrounding much of the waste were intact. Therefore two methods of pre-treating the waste prior to biological treatment were utilised in order to partially disrupt the plastic wrappers. These were:
i. shredding the waste to create a slurry
ii. lightly crushing the material to maintain the structure of the vegetables
The windrow was mechanically turned every seven days. Very little of the original cucumber feedstock remained in the windrow at the end of the eight week composting process. The plastic wrapping material, which formed 2% of the original waste also remained intimately mixed within the bulking agent.
A particular feature of the vermicomposting operation was that both types of cucumber waste were applied directly to the surface of the processing bed. This enabled the earthworms to enter the plastic wrappers; consuming and processing the cucumber. The consequence of this was that the plastic wrappers remained on the surface of the bed and was readily removed once processing has been completed. This makes removal of the plastic from the processing system a very simple and cost-effective operation compared with the composting process, which required the use of a bulking agent and which trapped the plastic.
• Feasibility of combining vermicomposting with an in-vessel composting system
With the introduction of the Animal By-Products Regulations (ABPRs) in 2003, the treatment of catering wastes using vermicomposting, without the wastes having first undergone a sanitisation process in a closed composting reactor is no longer permitted.
All catering wastes, including source segregated household wastes, must be composted in a closed reactor at a temperature of 60 °C for 2 days (40 cm particle size) or 70 °C for 1 hour (6 cm particle size). Further processing requirements for those wastes containing meat include subjecting the waste to a further composting stage to be carried out at the temperatures given
S:\biffa reports worms\Final Report.doc - 2 -
S:\biffa reports worms\Final Report.doc
above. For non-meat wastes it is sufficient to store the partially composted material for a minimum of 18 days before use.
It is important to note that while the composting times given in the regulations relate to temperature-time relationships for disease suppression, they do not take into account the much longer periods of composting which are required to produce stable, composted products, so that the second stage will need effective composting management rather than "storage" in order to produce compost.
It is clear from the regulations that all catering wastes must first be composted at high temperatures in a closed reactor and meat-containing wastes must undergo further thermophilic composting to comply with the regulations. Hence, vermicomposting would not be considered to be a suitable technology for the treatment of meat-containing wastes, since it operates in the low temperature or mesophilic range. However, for non-meat containing wastes, low temperature processes such as vermicomposting can be used to satisfy the "18day storage" requirement. Indeed, the use of vermicomposting to accelerate the compost maturation process and to enhance the partially-composted material from the closed reactor stage would appear to be a very good option for some composting operations. For non-meat containing wastes, other composting systems such as open air mechanically turned windrow systems would also be suitable for the second stage and for this application the composting temperatures and turning regimes need not comply with the ABPRs.
Combining the closed reactor stage with vermicomposting for the treatment of source segregated household waste may offer many benefits but very little research has been carried out into this type of combined system. In particular, many practical aspects of combining systems are unclear. For example, it is not known if hot, partially composted material from in-vessel systems can be applied directly to earthworm beds without killing the earthworm populations. Equally, although vermicomposting is known to accelerate the maturation process for some wastes, it is not known if maturation can be achieved more rapidly than other cost-effective processes, such as windrow composting systems.
Also, in terms of the environmental impact of vermicomposting and windrow composting systems when operated in combination with in-vessel systems, it is important to assess the greenhouse gas emissions from both approaches (see Appendix Three).
This trial was devised in order to address some of these fundamental questions, aiming to explore the practical aspects of combining vermicomposting with in-vessel systems. Partially composted material from an in-vessel system was applied to vermicomposting beds, and maturation rates, as well as greenhouse gas emissions were measured. The same material was also windrowed and measurements for the two trials were compared.
The trial showed that in practice vermicomposting can be combined with in-vessel composting systems. Vermicomposting was shown to be an effective method for fully stabilising and maturing the partially composted material from in-vessel composting systems. Windrow composting was equally effective but requires considerably more resources. Turning the heaps involves regular use of people, machinery and time. Therefore, these extra resources must be taken into account when deciding which system to use.
Pre-composting material using an in-vessel system prior to vermicomposting appeared to reduce nitrous oxide emissions from vermicomposting. It is recommended that greenhouse gas emissions from the overall in-vessel/vermicomposting system is investigated.
Optimising key operating parameters for vermicomposting systems and developing a bed system
i. Bed system
The main progress in this area was the development of the plastic bed system. WRC have designed and developed a modular plastic bed system using rotationally moulded recycled plastic. These are lightweight and clip together to the required size, and can be placed on any flat ground. They have drainage channels, so that leachate can be safely collected and used
S:\biffa reports worms\Final Report.doc - 3 -
S:\biffa reports worms\Final Report.doc
as a liquid fertiliser in controlled conditions. This collection is a requirement of current UK legislation, which forbids the direct drainage of such a material directly onto land, which worm beds in the past have neglected to take into consideration.
ii. Cover system
One area still requiring further work is the development of a suitable covering system. The cover is very important in maintaining constant conditions within the system. It also has to be easy and efficient for an operator to use. Due to the length of the beds, the covers are heavy and therefore a system that easily maneuvers these items is taking time to develop as different solutions are tested.
iii. Feeding
The most efficient way to feed the worms with large quantities of waste was also developed. The use of a tractor with a tank is optimal, since this requires minimal investment and tank conversion is reasonably simple. In terms of waste type applied to vermicomposting beds, it has been found that liquid sludge waste is easier to administer onto the beds by mixing it with shredded cardboard.
Others bodies involved in the project
Since the project is research based, there are few beneficiaries as of yet. The WRC has held a number of open days where representatives from local composting organisations have been shown the work which is taking place at the WRC. These groups will ultimately benefit from the overall research which will be shared at the end of the project. The WRC also give ongoing assistance to individuals and groups involved in composting by phone and through these people visiting the centre. Thirty five such visits were made in the last year.
Urban Mines (UM) and WRC are currently working with Lattice Foundation, which provided some third party funding for this project. The aim is to set up a link between the WRC and one of the young offenders institutions which Lattice work with. It is hoped that the young offenders will learn about worm farming and about environmental issues associated with waste. The end result from this will enable these individuals to set up worm beds at the prison in order to convert vegetable-derived canteen waste into compost to be used on their gardens. Discussions are ongoing regarding this.
Funding was also obtained from TXU energy for the installation of a solar panel and wind turbine. These power sources were used to supply heat to one bed to evaluate how effective and reliable this source of energy could be. Enough electricity is also generated from the wind turbine to power the electric fences in the worm beds.
Classes from two local primary schools have visited WRC, allowing pupils to see the practical aspects of waste management through vermiculture. This fits in with the Science National Curriculum at Key Stages One and Two, both in the areas of waste and biology (using vermicompost as a growth media). It is hoped that this will roll out to other local schools.
Media Coverage
In April 2002, Radio Humberside, visited the Worm Research Centre as part of a visit by the Northern Recycling Group. Information about the Biffa funded work at WRC was broadcast on the news every half-hour. An interview with the Centre’s Director, Steve Ross-Smith, was broadcast on the 6pm slot.
In September 2002, UM published a newsletter, which included a piece about the project (see Appendix Four). UM has made updates to their website regarding the Biffa project at WRC, see
http://www.urbanmines.org.uk/wrc.htm.
This also shows the installation of a windmill to provide energy to the electric fences within the beds, that keep the worms inside.
The 2003 summer issue of Composting News contained an article on the Biffa funded work at WRC, see Appendix Four.
S:\biffa reports worms\Final Report.doc - 4 -